Adam Gabor Szoke vs Botond Kisantal Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Oct at 09:21 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Gabor Szoke vs B. Kisantal

HUN
0
Win
Played
1
Win

HUN
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Szoke 0 - 1 Kisantal
They have played 2 sets in total, with Adam Gabor Szoke winning 0 and Botond Kisantal winning 2. The last match between Botond Kisantal and Adam Gabor Szoke was at the M15 Szabolcsveresmart, 29-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Botond Kisantal getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Szoke | 0 |
| Kisantal | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Szabolcsveresmart(10-29-25)
A. G. Szoke vs B. Kisantal H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 37.29% (22-37) | Career Total W/L | 42.37% (25-34) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. G. Szoke vs B. Kisantal Match Preview:
- Adam Gabor Szoke has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 41.38% of points compared to Botond Kisantal's 38.54%. Could this serve as a predictor for match success? It seems favorable.
- In return games, Szoke outshines Kisantal on opponent's second serve points, winning 51.52% versus Kisantal’s 37.50%.
- However, Kisantal performs better on first serve returns, winning 31.78% of points against Szoke's 20.15%. Is this an indicator of his return prowess?
- When it comes to crucial moments, Szoke displays resilience, saving 50.00% of breakpoints, slightly better than Kisantal's 45.45%.
- Looking over the past year, Kisantal appears more successful overall, winning 51.85% of matches, while Szoke won only 39.13%.
- Surface preference may be key: Szoke thrives on clay with a 41% win rate, whereas Kisantal's strongest surface is indoor hard courts, also at 41%.
- Considering player tiers, both predominantly compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, but Kisantal holds a better win percentage.
- Playing against higher-ranked opponents, Szoke faced tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 89.52 compared to Kisantal’s 136.56.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Kisantal has a historical advantage, winning 50% of such sets versus Szoke's 33%.
- Knowing how players perform at specific events can further refine predictions, especially as they advance in current tournaments.
Editorial Prediction (October 29, 2025, UTC):
Adam Gabor Szoke shows some promising statistics, particularly in return games, especially against opponents' second serve points. His ability to break during high-pressure moments could serve him well in tight situations.
However, Botond Kisantal's overall match-winning percentage is higher over the past year, indicating consistency. His performance on first serve returns also gives him an advantage, allowing him to handle opponents' strong serves effectively.
Despite Szoke's strength on clay, there could be a test if the match goes to a deciding set, where Kisantal has previously shown better success rates. Considering recent form and comparative performance, Botond Kisantal seems slightly favored to win this upcoming match.
Adam Gabor Szoke vs Botond Kisantal Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. G. Szoke vs B. Kisantal H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 3 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:17:9 | Average Match Time | 1:17:9 |
| 44% (24/55) | 1st Serve % | 63% (31/49) |
| 54% (13/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 84% (26/31) |
| 35% (11/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (7/18) |
| 25% (1/4) | Break Pts Won % | 45% (5/11) |
| 33% (16/49) | Return Points Win % | 56% (31/55) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. G. Szoke Recent Matches Played
B. Kisantal Recent Matches Played

A. G. Szoke vs B. Kisantal Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37.29% (22/37) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.37% (25/34) |
| 39.10% (52/81) | Sets Win/Loss | 42.97% (55/73) |
| 45.43% (591/710) | Games Win/Loss | 48.09% (579/625) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 22.22% (2/7) |
| 40.82% (20/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 43.59% (17/22) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.55% (6/5) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 11 | Aces Total | 29 |
| 0.04 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
| 25 | Total Double Faults | 50 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 107.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 118.64 |
| 62% (403/655) | 1st Serve % | 54% (412/769) |
| 56% (225/403) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (265/412) |
| 46% (115/252) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (152/357) |
| 46% (17/37) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (25/58) |
| 34% (190/557) | Return Points Win % | 38% (270/713) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 37.93% (22/36) | Futures W/L | 43.10% (25/33) |
| 37% (22/59) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (25/59) |
| 33% (4/12) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (5/8) |
| 47% (7/15) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (5/10) |
| 81% (26/21) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 96% (23/22) |
| 19% (26/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 4% (23/1) |
| 3% (33/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (36/3) |